Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 52% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 219 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $133.45 vs $621.95
- Up to 86% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.61 vs $4.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
144
66%
Value, $/FPS
$4.32/FPS
14%
Price, $
$621.95
21%
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $133.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |