Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1183 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 144 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $289.02 vs $621.95
- Up to 59% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.01 vs $4.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
89%
Value, $/FPS
$4.86/FPS
41%
Price, $
$621.95
46%
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$289.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $289.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |