Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $143.57 vs $144.57
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - 133 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - $1.09 vs $1.10 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.57
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $144.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |