Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 2259 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700KF - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 412 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $319.99 vs $621.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.78 vs $1.81 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
43%
Price, $
$621.95
51%
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7454 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
412
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7453 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |