Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 216 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $279.00 vs $621.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.29 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
94%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
42%
Price, $
$621.95
44%
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7450 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7449 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |