Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 61 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $143.57 vs $283.49
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - $0.70 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400 - 214 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
53%
Price, $
$283.49
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |