Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3430 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon X5680 - 155 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |