Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3728 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5680 - 188 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2541 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |