Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2496 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in Dota 2 than Xeon W3670 - 184 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 64 vs 12 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
