Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3370 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3670 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
