Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2130 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Xeon W3565 - 694 vs 687 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |