Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 158 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 187 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 65 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 4 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |