Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 640 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $81.39 vs $110.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-8100 - $0.49 vs $0.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3200G - 170 vs 166 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
166
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |