Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-1290P outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-1290P is 2123 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-1290P
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4160T - 280 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Xeon W-1290P - 35 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W-1290P
Mobile • May 13th, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-1290P | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
