Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-1290P outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-1290P is 2074 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-1290P
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 230 vs 219 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon W-1290P - 105 vs 125 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W-1290P
Mobile • May 13th, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-1290P | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
| 20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
