Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2346 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5530 - 678 vs 669 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5530 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
678
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Gainestown | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |