Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2346 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Xeon E5530 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5530 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Gainestown | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |