Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700 is 910 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 724 vs 665 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $225.0 vs $399.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.31 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
724
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |