Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 2163 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 230 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $249.0 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76912 minutes ago
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
40.40577716643741%
Multi-Core
9619
63.02168643123894%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |