Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 1303 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G4900 - 217 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |