Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 848 days older than Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-7400T - 345 vs 335 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |