Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 is 2219 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G4900 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |