Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2665 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2665 is 231 days older than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Performs up to 0% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-8320 - 297 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 115 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |