Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 460 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-2640 - 177 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2719 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |