Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2640 - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |