Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1397 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 213 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 64 vs 16 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
