Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 31% better in F1 23 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 186 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |