Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |