Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
