Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 1412 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than EPYC 7551P - 281 vs 264 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11260H - 64 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11260H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
