Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1485 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 85 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 129 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 48 vs 6 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
