Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1485 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 150 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 105 vs 250 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$725
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $725 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30055 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
71.7408906882591%
Multi-Core
5378
72.60699338463616%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |