Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1120 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4702MQ - 103 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 37 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |