Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 700 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4160T - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
