Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 374 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than EPYC 7551P - 242 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 64 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Broadwell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
