Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1387 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G645 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 54% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $70.0 vs $150.71
- Up to 53% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.33 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
47%
Price, $
$150.71
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6093 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |