Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1575M v5 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1575M v5 is 522 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7551P - 256 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 64 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1575M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Skylake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
