Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 503 days older than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 176 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1575M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
