Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 798 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 160 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 35 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 87 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
