Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 2428 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 236 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 35 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 87 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
