Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 758 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 7551P - 544 vs 496 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 64 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Broadwell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
