Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1314 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 7 3700U - 216 vs 213 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
