Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2723 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 45 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 28% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 139 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
