Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3153 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1260L - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 35 vs 45 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
