Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 1254 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1260L - 174 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
