Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4710HQ outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4710HQ is 1094 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 45 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Performs up to 20% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1260L - 157 vs 131 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
