Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v2 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v2 is 891 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 80 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1240 - 278 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
