Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 1091 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6300 - 351 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |