Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 1493 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
