Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 903 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 5% better in New World than Core i7-4800MQ - 112 vs 107 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 47 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
