Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Core i7-5600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 232 days newer than Core i7-5600U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-5600U - 202 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
